Restructuring is one of the few genuinely legal levers available against Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty (ABSD), and it remains legal today, but it is not free, and it does not suit every couple.
How the transfer actually works
One spouse sells or gifts their share of an existing jointly owned property to the other spouse, so that one spouse ends up owning the property outright and the other returns to owning zero properties. That spouse can then buy the next property as a first property purchase, at 0% ABSD, rather than the 20% ABSD a second property would attract for a Singapore Citizen. On a $2 million purchase, that is a $400,000 difference.
The costs that eat into the saving
- Buyer's Stamp Duty on the transfer. The transfer of the share is itself a dutiable transaction, assessed on the value of the share being transferred, or its market value if higher.
- Legal and conveyancing fees. The transfer needs proper legal documentation to be a genuine, defensible change of ownership.
- CPF refund. The transferring spouse must refund any CPF used for the original purchase, including accrued interest, currently 2.5% per annum, reducing the cash they walk away with.
- Loan restructuring. The mortgage typically needs to be refinanced solely in the remaining spouse's name, reassessed under that spouse's own Total Debt Servicing Ratio headroom, which is not guaranteed to be approved on the same terms.
Is it still legal?
Yes. Restructuring is a legitimate transfer of ownership, not a loophole, provided it is done properly, with the correct stamp duty paid and a genuine change in beneficial ownership. IRAS does scrutinise structures that look artificial or reversible, so the transfer needs to be real: proper legal documents, real consideration where applicable, and no informal side arrangement to reverse it later.
When it does not save money
The quote worth repeating from the site's own restructuring coverage is that "not every couple saves money", the breakeven analysis must be run first. If the transfer stamp duty, legal fees, CPF refund and any worse loan terms add up to more than the ABSD you would have paid anyway, restructuring is the wrong move for that specific couple and purchase size.
Frequently asked questions
Is decoupling still legal in Singapore?
Yes. It is a legitimate transfer of ownership, not a loophole, provided it is done properly with full stamp duty paid on the transfer and a genuine change of beneficial ownership. IRAS scrutinises structures that look artificial, so the transfer needs to be real and defensible.
What costs offset the ABSD saved by restructuring?
Buyer's Stamp Duty on the value of the share being transferred, legal and conveyancing fees, the transferring spouse's CPF refund with accrued interest, and potential loan restructuring or refinancing costs now that only one spouse remains on the mortgage.
Wondering if restructuring makes sense for your situation?
Winfred runs the full breakeven, transfer stamp duty, CPF refund, loan reassessment, against the ABSD you would actually save, before you commit to anything.
Book a free 30 minute callWinfred Quek is an Associate Marketing Consultant at Crestbrick Pte Ltd (CEA Licence No. L31010886H). CEA R073319H. This page is for general information only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Rates and rules reflect the position as at 3 Aug 2026; verify current figures with IRAS, HDB, or MAS before making any decision.