The information and insights provided on this page are for informational purposes only and are based on Winfred's independent research and views. While we strive to ensure accuracy and reliability, we do not guarantee the completeness, correctness, or timeliness of the data presented. Real estate investments are subject to various risks, including but not limited to market fluctuations, changes in economic conditions, interest rate volatility, regulatory shifts, liquidity constraints, and unforeseen property-specific risks. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and investment outcomes may vary. This page does not constitute investment, financial, or professional advice and should not be relied upon as such. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and seek advice from qualified professionals before making any investment decisions.
It lines up two projects across PSF, tenure, years of lease remaining, distance to MRT, expected gross yield, years to TOP and total units. Each row picks a winner on a simple rule, lower PSF wins, more lease wins, and so on, then tallies a quantitative score so you can see where each project leads.
No. Lower PSF wins that single row, but PSF alone ignores layout efficiency, tenure, location and upside. A higher PSF freehold near an MRT can outperform a cheaper 99 year unit further out. Use the PSF comparison as one input, not the verdict, and weigh it against the other rows.
Freehold holds value better over a long horizon, while a 99 year lease decays, especially in the later years. The tool credits more remaining lease, but the right choice depends on your holding period and exit plan. A long term holder may value freehold more than a shorter term investor would.
It depends on your goal, which is why the tool marks project size as depends rather than picking a winner. Smaller developments feel more exclusive but trade less often, so resale liquidity is thinner. Larger projects offer more transaction data and easier exit. Match the trade off to whether you prioritise exclusivity or liquidity.
No, and the tool says so. It is a thin quantitative read. A real decision also needs developer track record, layout efficiency per unit, MCST history, tenant demand and URA Master Plan upside nearby. Use the scoreboard to shortlist, then get Winfred Quek's read before committing.